XLV.

[alt_lana]

I wish there were more occasions like last night's Ball. I do love a night of dancing, and it was such good fun to see everyone in fancy dress. Especially the men with their short robes and silk stockings and heeled shoes! It must be said, though, that the women were more uniformly flattered by the styles of their robes: not every man looks well in great hose.

I was glad that Ned and I had gone twice during the week for dancing lessons. I wouldn't have dared attempt a galliard if we hadn't, but it was so exhilarating! I wonder if we could get up a club once a month or so for Renaissance dancing?

There was so much that I can't begin to do it justice--so much that was beautiful, spectacular, unique, intriguing, and a few things that were downright shocking. But we all agreed that the funniest thing was something we'd have missed if we hadn't gone out to take the air at just the moment we did: if you missed the dancing minstrels, you really missed a show! And if you saw it, I bet you agree!


Orion. Thank you so much for the tickets. Ned and I enjoyed it all week, and last night was truly special. I only wish you could have been with us.

Comments

Re: Private Message to Lana Sandoval

[alt_lana]

Yes, Shivani does work for the Rowles, but she's never said anything about any unpleasantness between Mr and Mrs Rowles.

I mean, she's not very happy working for them, but I think it's more to do with how much they expect her to do (nearly everything to do with the children--they don't seem very interested in being parents).

And Mr Rowle is, well, he's a bit harsh. With everyone. But surely Mrs Rowle knew that when she fell in love with him. Or maybe she didn't. Fall in love, I mean. I suppose there are lots of reasons she might have married him that have little to do with love.

It's just that one does hope to find someone suitable and lovable, too. I suppose it's not always possible, though, and it's true that men (more than boys even) can be disappointing. That's why I said you shouldn't risk the things you care about--your marks, your connections, your family's approval, and your reputation--on boys while you're still in school.

I'm sorry, though, if you've had a disappointment in that area.

Re: Private Message to Lana Sandoval

[alt_padma]

Well, I wasn't risking them - I mean, I took your advice and I made sure that Page and I were always in groups and no one could say anything improper. Only Page didn't much care for that. He said he thought I didn't fancy him or I'd have found ways to be alone with him and snog and stuff.

But I think he really just wanted to ask Bell out, because it's been barely a week since he told me he didn't want to see me anymore - like that, anyway - and he was in Madam Puddifoot's with Bell today. Snogging each other's faces off, practically.

It's so unfair. I explained why we couldn't do anything and he took it all wrong anyway. I dunno. I just think they're more trouble than they're worth. Boys, I mean.

Anyway, I probably won't get to marry because of something like love. I guess I'll just have to do what Zabini's mum's done and take lovers once I'm married. Only I shan't get caught like Mrs Rowle!

Re: Private Message to Lana Sandoval

[alt_lana]

I'm sorry about Page, but you see that's just the reason why you shouldn't place too much trust in boys. I can't think who Bell is even. A nothing, I'm sure.

I wouldn't recommend taking Mrs Lindorm (she hasn't married again, has she?) as a model. If you can't think why, I'd rather not explain. But you're quite right: if you are going to take a lover, you ought to be considerably more cautious than Mrs Rowle seems to have been.

I still can't imagine it's true. Hewett's lucky to be alive today: Rowle is not a man I'd wish to cross.